Cold fusion
Honest!Apr 28th 2005
From The Economist print edition
SourceA report of a desktop experiment that produces nuclear fusion is bound to raise eyebrows. But this time, the results look convincingPHYSICISTS who meddle with cold fusion, like psychologists who dabble in the paranormal, are likely to be labelled quacks by their peers. This is due to an infamous incident in 1989 when Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann held a press conference to announce their discovery of nuclear fusion in what amounted to a test-tube full of water connected to a battery. In particular, they said that they were getting more energy out of the process than they put into it. Their result was instantly dubbed “cold fusion”, to contrast it with giant fusion-reactor experiments that attempt to reproduce the ultra-high temperatures found inside the sun. But when it failed to stand up to scrutiny, confusion—and eventually outrage—ensued.
In 2002, history repeated itself as farce with the announcement by a group at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee of fusion inside the bubbles that are produced by ultrasonic waves travelling through a liquid. This result passed the peer-review process, but was immediately attacked by another group—from the same laboratory—which claimed to find no such effect. There was a counterclaim by yet a third team last year, and a final verdict on “bubble fusion” is still not in. But most people have lost interest in the debate, assuming that anyone claiming to have observed fusion in a desktop experiment is a crank or a fraud. This attitude, however, may yet turn out to be mistaken. Desk-top fusion may be possible after all, according to an article published in this week's Nature by three researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).
Brian Naranjo, Jim Gimzewski and Seth Putterman have been meticulous in their experiment, and in particular in their measurement of one of the tell-tales of nuclear fusion, the production of neutrons. Their results have been peer-reviewed, and they make no wild claims of surplus energy being produced. Given past excesses, such caution is understandable. And it may indeed be the case that their technique, which involves banging together the nuclei of deuterium atoms (a heavy form of hydrogen) using a tiny crystal in a palm-sized vacuum chamber, will never provide a source of power. It could have some interesting applications, nonetheless.
Energy from crystals
In principle, nuclear fusion is a simple process. All you have to do is push two suitable atomic nuclei close enough together for them to overcome their mutual electrical repulsion (since both are positively charged) and they will merge. This merger releases oodles of energy. The usual way to push nuclei together is to smash them into one another at high speed. In thermonuclear fusion (the sort that happens in the sun, in hydrogen bombs, and in traditional fusion experiments) that speed is achieved by heating the atoms up. But this, as Dr Naranjo and his colleagues realised, is not the only way to do things. You can, as they have done, simply accelerate a stream of nuclei to high velocity, and fire them into a stationary target.
Traditional accelerators, such as those used in particle-physics experiments, use high-voltage electricity to achieve this acceleration. However, they are cumbersome and they consume a lot of power while doing so. Dr Naranjo, by contrast, has devised a compact way of generating high voltages at much lower power using a so-called pyroelectric crystal.
Heating such a crystal (or, rather, warming it from -30°C to just above freezing point) deforms its structure in a way that concentrates positive charge in one place and negative charge in another. That results in a big voltage between the two. The researchers then amplified the effect of the positive charge by attaching a metal tip to the place where it was accumulating. This concentrated the electrical field in the same way that the point of a lightning conductor concentrates the stroke.
Dr Naranjo used this effect two ways: first to strip deuterium atoms of their electrons and second to repel the resulting stream of deuterium nuclei at high speed towards a target containing more deuterium. When two deuterium nuclei (each composed of a proton and a neutron) fuse, the result is a type of helium composed of two protons and a neutron, a free neutron, and a lot of energy. The bombardment also produces a lot of X-rays. By counting the neutrons and measuring the X-rays the researchers estimate that about 1,000 pairs of deuterium nuclei were fusing every second.
This is, as they are the first to admit, a long way from producing a significant amount of energy. And although they reckon they could boost the fusion rate 1,000-fold with better apparatus, that still might not reach the magic threshold of producing more energy than it takes to run the experiment. Beyond that, they are understandably unwilling to speculate.
This does not, however, mean that their device will have no applications. With only a little tweaking it could be turned into a handheld X-ray scanner, which would be a significant medical advance. Not yet a precursor to a starship engine, perhaps, but maybe an ancestor of Dr McCoy's portable diagnosis machine.