Russia Has Crossed the Line - By Richard Holbrooke

<blockquote>"Exactly what happened in South Ossetia last week is unclear. Each side will argue its own version. But we know, without doubt, that Georgia was responding to repeated provocative attacks by South Ossetian separatists controlled and funded by the Kremlin. This is a not a war Georgia wanted; it believed that it was slowly gaining ground in South Ossetia through a strategy of soft power."</blockquote>

Russia Has Crossed the Line

By Richard C. Holbrooke, Ronald D. Asmus
13 August 2008
Source

In weeks and years past, each of us has argued that Russia was pursuing a policy of regime change toward Georgia and its pro-Western, democratically elected president, Mikheil Saakashvili. We predicted that, absent strong and unified Western diplomatic involvement, war was coming.

Now, tragically, an escalation of violence in South Ossetia has culminated in a full-scale Russian invasion of Georgia. The West, especially the United States, could have prevented this war. A watershed moment is at hand in the West's post-Cold War relations with Russia.

Exactly what happened in South Ossetia last week is unclear. Each side will argue its own version. But we know, without doubt, that Georgia was responding to repeated provocative attacks by South Ossetian separatists controlled and funded by the Kremlin. This is a not a war Georgia wanted; it believed that it was slowly gaining ground in South Ossetia through a strategy of soft power.

Whatever mistakes Georgia's government made cannot justify Russia's actions. The Kremlin has invaded a neighbor, an illegal act of aggression that violates the United Nations Charter and fundamental principles of cooperation and security in Europe.

Beginning a well-planned war as the Olympics were opening violates the ancient tradition of a truce to conflict during the games. Russia's willingness to create a war zone 40 kilometers from the Black Sea city of Sochi, where it is to host the Winter Games in 2014, hardly demonstrates its commitment to Olympic ideals. In contrast, Russia's timing suggests that Prime Minister Vladimir Putin seeks to overthrow Saakashvili well ahead of the U.S. elections, and thus avoid beginning relations with the next president on an overtly confrontational note.

Russia's goal is not simply, as it claims, restoring the status quo in South Ossetia. It wants regime change in Georgia. It has opened a second front in the other disputed Georgian territory, Abkhazia, just south of Sochi. But its largest goal is to replace Saakashvili -- a man Putin despises -- with a president more subject to Kremlin influence.

As Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt pointed out Saturday, Moscow's rationale for invading has parallels to the darkest chapters of Europe's history. Having issued passports to tens of thousands of Abkhaz and South Ossetians, Moscow now claims that it must intervene to protect them -- a tactic reminiscent of one used by Nazi Germany at the start of World War II.

Russia seeks to roll back democratic breakthroughs on its borders, to destroy any chance of further NATO or European Union enlargement and to reestablish a sphere of hegemony over its neighbors. By trying to destroy a democratic, pro-Western Georgia, Moscow is sending a message that, in its part of the world, being close to the United States and the West does not pay.

This moment could well mark the end of an era in Europe during which realpolitik and spheres of influence were supposed to be replaced by cooperative norms and a country's right to choose its own path. Hopes for a more liberal Russia under President Dmitry Medvedev will need to be re-examined. His justification for this invasion reads more like Leonid Brezhnev than Mikhail Gorbachev. While no one wants a return to Cold War-style confrontation, Russia's behavior poses a direct challenge to European and international order.

What can the West do? First, Georgia deserves the West's solidarity and support. The West must get the fighting stopped and preserve Georgia's territorial integrity within its current international border. As soon as hostilities cease, there should be a major, coordinated trans-Atlantic effort to help Tbilisi rebuild and recover.

Second, we should not pretend that Russia is a neutral peacekeeper in conflicts on its borders. Russia is part of the problem, not the solution. For too long, Moscow has used existing international mandates to pursue neo-imperial policies. The West must disavow these mandates and insist on truly neutral international forces, under the United Nations, to monitor a future cease-fire and to mediate.

Third, the West needs to counter Russian pressure on its neighbors, especially Ukraine -- most likely the next target in Moscow's efforts to create a new sphere of hegemony. The United States and the EU must be clear that Ukraine and Georgia will not be condemned to some kind of gray zone.

Finally, the United States and the EU must make clear that this kind of aggression will affect relations and Russia's standing in the West. While Western military intervention in Georgia is out of the question -- and no one wants a 21st-century version of the Cold War -- Russia's actions cannot be ignored. There is a vast array of political, economic and other areas in which Russia's role and standing will have to be re-examined. The Kremlin must also be put on notice that its own prestige project -- the Sochi Olympics in 2014 -- will be affected by its behavior.

Weak Western diplomacy and lack of transatlantic unity failed to prevent an avoidable war. Only strong trans-Atlantic unity can stop this war and begin to repair the immense damage done. Otherwise, we can add one more issue to the growing list of the President George W. Bush's foreign policy failures.

Richard Holbrooke served as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and Ronald D. Asmus served as deputy assistant secretary of state in President Bill Clinton's administration. © Project Syndicate